• Home
  • Nuclear Power for Poland

Nuclear Power for Poland

11 czerwca 2021 Zespół IS Raport 4 min

The authors of the report entitled ‘Nuclear Energy for Poland’ are:
dr Paweł Gajda,
Wojciech Gałosz,
Urszula Kuczyńska,
Anna Przybyszewska,
Adam Rajewski,
Łukasz Sawicki.

The recommendations presented below are the result of considerations of the issues raised in the report. They include insights, conclusions, and key information on nuclear power.

1. Nuclear power is a proven zero-emission energy source that should be implemented in Poland
In Poland, it is necessary to make a decision on the construction of new generation capacities based on technologies that guarantee safety and reliability of energy supplies. Nuclear power uses mature and proven technologies that enable decarbonization of the electricity sector without the need to make revolutionary changes in the way it operates. The large-scale light-water reactor (LWR) designs (conventionally referred to as Generation III) offered today are an evolutionary development of solutions that have been in use for many years, which makes them refined and reliable. Although there are numerous proposals for different solutions in the market, in terms of both the mode of operation (e.g. high-temperature reactor (HTR)) and the power (small modular reactor (SMR)), these technologies are not ready for implementation on a significant scale in commercial power generation at present, which does not allow the energy transition plans currently under development to be based on them.

2. Nuclear power uses safe technologies

The operating experience gained since the 1950s proves that nuclear power is one of the safest ways to generate electricity. Further safety improvements continue to be a priority for development of nuclear technologies and this is reflected in the current designs on offer. Industry transparency and international oversight play an important role in ensuring continued safety of nuclear power plants. In addition, the nuclear industry provides full oversight of the waste generated at all stages of power plants’ life and fuel cycle (including uranium mining and processing), which is a unique approach compared to other industries. In addition, due to the small volume of nuclear fuel (which,
among other things, makes it possible to store supplies for several years in advance) and flexibility in the choice of the source of supply, nuclear power has a positive impact on the country’s energy security, among other things.

3. Nuclear power is essential for Poland to achieve climate neutrality

Poland should work towards achieving climate neutrality and adapting to the ongoing regulatory changes and
environmental requirements.
The participation of nuclear power in the energy transition guarantees a lower cost of transition to a zeroemission energy system and ensures a rapid increase of stable and zero-emission capacity in the system, thus
ensuring its effective and deep decarbonization. Continued use and dynamic development of nuclear energy
are necessary in order to meet the climate neutrality targets.

4. Nuclear power has a positive impact on the economy
It can be estimated that implementation of a project of construction and operation of nuclear power plants
in Poland with the total capacity of 6 to 9 GWe will create tens of thousands of jobs, directly and indirectly,
depending on the pace and the final scope of the Polish Nuclear Power Program (PNPP). Additional jobs
created by the emergence of a new industry and increased consumer spending could double those numbers.
Research indicates that regions attractive for tourists in which a NPP is located can reap additional benefits
from its presence in their territory. By implementing a nuclear power program, Poland would have a chance to
stimulate its economy and make it resilient in the event of future economic crises similar to the one that has
occurred in connection with the C0VID-19 pandemic.

5. Nuclear power plants supply cheap electricity

Basing the transition of the Polish power sector on nuclear power plants, which are the cheapest energy sources,
should be a priority for the government, and decisions on investments should be made immediately. Each year
of delay causes measurable and significant economic losses, leads to gradual disappearance of industry and
jobs, increases the risk of a socio-economic crisis, and weakens the country’s defense capabilities. The reason
for this state of affairs are the rapidly rising energy costs for industrial consumers and the progressive loss of
competitiveness of Polish companies in EU and global markets. The business model for Polish nuclear power
plants must be well thought-out, comprehensive, acceptable, and socially just, as it will determine Poland’s
development for the next 100 years.

6. There is a stable high social support for nuclear power in Poland

There is a stable high support for nuclear energy in Poland, both on the national level and locally. Polish public
opinion remains sensitive to arguments related to economy, safety, and energy independence, as well as to the
argument related to the prestige resulting from development of the nuclear power sector. The experience of
other countries shows that consistent implementation of nuclear programs by the government makes public
support even stronger. In the case of Poland, this means a need to make decisions quickly and to pursue
target consistently. At the same time, extensive communication activities will be needed to provide reliable
information on the benefits of nuclear power.

7. Polish industry has experience with nuclear projects and will benefit from development of nuclear power in Poland
It is also necessary to start activities related to construction of technical facilities for the new industry as soon
as possible. In Poland, there are about 70 companies that have competencies and newly acquired experience
in construction of nuclear facilities abroad, and several hundred more Polish companies are in a position to
acquire such competencies in a short time once the Polish Nuclear Power Program (PNPP) is launched

8. The business model for the Polish nuclear power should take into account the interests of both investors and energy consumers.
The government should develop a new business model for nuclear power that meets all of the following criteria:
• investment certainty (stability) and attractiveness for investors;
• guarantee of take-up of the electricity produced;
• guarantee of a fixed selling price for the electricity produced;
• ensuring low energy costs for consumers and certainty of supply;
• compliance with EU legislation and strategies, and the highest possible degree of resistance to possible
obstructionist actions by the EC;
• ease and speed of implementation;
• comprehensiveness and reproducibility – applicability to the entire PNPP;
• minimized burden on the state budget and public finances;
• flexibility; and
• social acceptability.
The adopted model should also help rebuild the Polish economy after the crisis caused by the COVID-19
pandemic. It should support reindustrialization of the country and development of Polish companies, and
should use Polish capital as much as possible, so as to avoid excessive increases in foreign debt and deepening
of the trade deficit

PRZECZYTAJ TEŻ  Premier popełnił atomowy błąd, za który będziemy płacić przez lata

Chcesz pobrać ten raport?
Zapisz się do naszego newslettera.

Zapisałeś się! Potwierdzenie znajdziesz w skrzynce

Wystąpił błąd. Spróbuj ponownie

Instytut Sobieskiego wykorzysta podany e-mail do wysyłki informacji o nowych publikacjach i wydarzeniach.

Dziękujemy za zapis na newsletter Instytutu Sobieskiego. Poniżej znajdują się linki do raportów.

  1. Gajda, Gałosz, Kuczyńska, Przybyszewska, Rajewski, Sawicki - Energetyka jądrowa - PDF
  2. Grosse, Seredyński - Spór o praworządność w UE - PDF
  3. Michałowski, Komorowski, Kozłowska - Polska cyfrowa po COVID-19 - PDF
  4. Hańczyc, Sochocka, Leszek - Opieka Medyczna nad osobami starszymi - PDF
  5. Wdzięczak, Michałowski - Jak płacą Polacy - PDF
  6. Przybyszewska, Seredyński - SMR dla Polski - PDF
  7. Kozłowska, Zaborowski - PPP dla tramwajów - PDF
  8. Seredyński, Pawłuszko - Polski Czołg - PDF
  9. Michałowski - Polska (prawdziwie) cyfrowa - PDF
  10. Michałowski - Iot i AI w Polsce - PDF
  11. Konopinski (red) - Uruchomienie CPK - PDF
  12. Seredyński, Pawłuszko - Samoloty bojowe - PDF
  13. Stys, Foks - Gospodarowanie ZSEE - PDF
  14. Dietl et al - Polska Innowacyjność - PDF
  15. Styś, Foks - Circular Economy - PDF
  16. Stys, Tubis, Zaborowski - Inteligentny transport - PDF
  17. Stys, Foks, Moskwik - KPGO 2030 - PDF
  18. Kędzierski (red) - Jak cyfryzować Polskę - PDF
  19. Kędzierski (red) - Jak wspierać rozwój - PDF
  20. Krygiel - Aktywność obywatelska - PDF
  21. Zajdler, Gałczyński - Smartsument - PDF
  22. Soloch, Dryblak, Żurawski - Organizacje proobronne - PDF
  23. Lommot-Janowicz (red.) - Dobre Praktyki - PDF
  24. Stys, Foks - Rynek gospodarowania odpadami - PDF
  25. Poradnik - Niezbędne zmiany prawa - PDF
  26. Poradnik - TUW w samorządzie - PDF
  27. Soloch, Dryblak - Budowanie zdolności obronnych - PDF
  28. Skiba, Rapkiewicz, Kędzierski (red.) - Węgry Orbana - PDF
  29. Rapkiewicz (red.) - Budowa wspólnoty finansowej - PDF
  30. Zajdler - Future of gas pricing - PDF
  31. Staniłko (red) - Europejski ład - PDF
  32. Zajdler - Farmy wiatrowe - PDF
  33. Krajewski-Siuda (red.) - Samoleczenie - PDF
  34. Rapkiewicz (red.) - Efektywność - PDF
  35. Hara, Zajdler, Staniłko - Formuły cenowe - PDF
  36. Staniłko (red.) - Katastrofa - PDF
  37. Zawisza - Gaz dla Polski - PDF
  38. Krajewski-Siuda, Romaniuk - Zdrowie publiczne - PDF
  39. Piskorski (red.) - Szkoła domowa - PDF
  40. Skiba - Rządzić państwem - PDF
  41. Dobrowolski - Prawdziwy dług - PDF